Vatives galleries

All those ppl who received receipts can you please give us 3 pieces of data

1) Was there an LUD update on ur I-140 (Last Update Date on the USCIS.gov website)
2) What Service center did you guys file in?
3) Do your recept numbers start from LIN or SRC?

1) The LUD updated from 6/16/2007 to 8/12/2007

2) I-140 was sent to Texas, approved on 6/15/2007;
on the I-485 USPS receipt I see that it was received on July 2, 2007 11:34am by B.Gerkensmeyer in Lincoln, NE

3) I-140 receipt starts with SRC.

No checks chashed, no word from lawyer.

----------------
EB3
Priority Date : 03/31/2007
I-140 Approved on : 06/15/2006 by TSC
LUD on I-140 : 8/12/2007
I-485 sent to NSC and Received on July 2nd @ 11:34 AM signed by B.Gerkensmeyer in Lincoln, NE

We could have got 1000 from each of the IV member, if July Fiasco hadn't happened.

Most I spoke to are content with EAD/AP.

Even if 1000 of our ~41000 members contribute 100 dollars each, we can host two more events like this.

It makes sense to ask help from outside of the organization only when our internal resources are all exhausted. However, sadly, most of us do not want to even contribute for the good cause. :o

Check this news out:

http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1092805

Do you think is there any possibility that US government may raise the cap this year?

ORDER ID:
EGONZA0EGFQS
RECIPIENT INFORMATION:
Name: Emilio T Gonzalez
Company: US Citizen and Immigration Service
Address: 20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W

Washington, DC 20529
Card Message: Dear Mr. Gonzalez, Thanks for giving us
hope for few hours on July 1st and
taking it away(I-485 Reversal). We
enjoyed the ride and the pain. Hope
USCIS recovers from its insanity soon.
Day Phone: 202-307-1565

Cableching,

What ASC did you go to?

What does it mean to say EB2 ROW? What is the reference point of Rest of World? Thanks.

Dude, Why dont you call me at 412 915 9526.

Just because of your false accusations, people have started thinking iam faking my identity. This should stop. Are you hearing me or not ? Why dont you go and check your website logs for activites in the last couple of days
and see from which IP Address, GC status is sending those messages. Find out the location from where he is sending messages. Dont spread false news.
I want you to make it clear in the forum that MadhuVj and GCStatus are different people.

Hope you first fix this issue, you created.

MadhuVJ

..... Now where did all these old PD's pop from. Definitely sub has a big role to play. As I said in my earlier post, nothing can be done abt. this.
....


You are right that PD of the substute labors are clogging the lines. But something can certainly be done. We can ask CIS to assign the date of filing of I-140 as the PD for substitute case. This is not same as revoking all substituted labors. This is simply rearranging the serial numbers in the queue. And this does not require any law from the lawmakers. So this should be low hanging fruit.

In the bad economy if everyone can get EAD it will help more. All we need is an admin fix to allow filing of I485 and get EAD benefits

Desi3933 provided 'proof' that you need a legislative fix to allow filing of 485 when priority date is not current in this thread.

http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=23695&referrerid=15623

Again, do start and pursue that effort in a separate thread.

just contributed

I believe as per the current rules CIS routinely assigns the PD of the substitute labor as the PD of the replacement worker.

What Rajiv Khanna says is very fair, but unfortunately CIS is not run by Khanna. In any case, can you please post the link to the aforementioned blog.

This can be best issue to sue USCIS. Good People will get benefit from this

Ya, and I have heard the stories that mankind was originated in Africa. So that does not mean I can claim citizenship of Africa. These things are earned and not asked for. Do you have in you to earn this?

Every race is an immigrant for this country(except native americans.)
Infact this country is built up by the immigrants.
Please shut your mouth get the heck out of here.

Come on guys it's the weekend..relax and enjoy it
It's ok to let go of provocations
Life is unpredictable so relish every moment
Try yoga ...it works wonders for me :)

You're in a tricky situation. If you leave the country now you could possibly face a 3 year ban on entry. If your H1 NOA did not contain a I-94 then you're possibly on unlawful stay. You could however file for a waiver with an explanation, but it is at the consulates discretion. I would find an Immigration lawyer and consult with him/her.

Deecha,
What is this waiver with an explanation? Can i do it while staying in USA? Or is it advisible for me to get out of the country before september 2007, so that even if there is a re-entry issue, it is only for 3 years?

Thanks and Regards,
rxk2303

Thanks a bunch for ur efforst IV. Thanks again

Good question. I was wondering that too. Though I have taken an appointment for Monday 8/24.

Hi ruchigup: Could you please update on how your infopass appt went on moday. My attorney said that we could take infopass even now, they(IOs) might keep our case in the queue ready for review for GC in September. But, not quite sure if they (IOs) would really do something abt it in August.

Thanks Govind!

I know someone who got theirs on Tuesday, and got their case approved today. This was Fy2008 Masters, Premium processing
I also applied for Masters Quota, but didnt do premium processing and haven't received the Receipt notice

Count me in when filing the lawsuit.

[QUOTE=techquest]Harish,
> you will file with all the available supporting documents and you will make it > appear as if you indeed are filling under Master's quota. Your application
> will have insufficient doccumentation and they will raise a query on your
> app. and by the time this happens you can hope that you will receive your
> degree, or you will delay it till the maximum possible extent and will send
> them back with supporting Masters Degree. Again these are just my
> thinking you might want to validate with some professionals as whether or
> not this logic stands a chance.

As a general rule, any additional evidence you provide must prove that you had the right status (in this case, your M.S.) at the time of filing.

The labor substitution was meant to have the employer not lose his place in the queue. However people started abusing it and that was closed.
So if any, please focus your energy on recapture.

Well, you can find many similar questions in life.

Labor substitution may be legal but it is unethical. When everything depends on when you join the queue, how can one cut the line?